Bennett Todd wrote:
>
> If the only grounds is lack of interest, please just freeze it. It
> can be tossed later if people turn up strong counterarguments, like
> difficulting keeping the language's semantics intact or difficulty
> delivering better performance than perl5.
I agree. I haven't hea
2000-09-25-12:04:44 Matt Youell:
> Unless I hear compelling arguments to the contrary, I'll be
> withdrawing RFC 161 on Tuesday due to lack of interest.
If the only grounds is lack of interest, please just freeze it. It
can be tossed later if people turn up strong counterarguments, like
difficult
Unless I hear compelling arguments to the contrary, I'll be withdrawing RFC
161 on Tuesday due to lack of interest.
Matt Youell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
