> You can have your cake, but not force us to eat it too... > > Like $AUTOLOAD, $ME would be dynamically scoped: The first time I saw the bareword "self" keyword I almost wet myself in horror, but I would say that $AUTOLOAD is a disaster that should not be repeated. And that's the way that this $ME thing is headed... > We seem to cope with $AUTOLOAD okay, without the need to: I hate it, it's miserable. Too much hidden trickery and special cases. I could deluge you with examples but I'd rather not. A sub call would probably be better. We have ref(), want(), and other calls to find out context, why not self() to backtrace package context? -Nate
- Re: RFC 124 (v1) Sort order for any hash David L. Nicol
- RFC for $ME class variable (was Re: RFC 124 (v... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC for $ME class variable (was Re: RFC 1... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC for $ME class variable (was Re: RF... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC for $ME class variable (was Re... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC for $ME class variable (w... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC for $ME class variabl... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC for $ME class variabl... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC for $ME class variable (w... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC for $ME class variabl... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC for $ME class variabl... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC for $ME class variabl... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC for $ME class variabl... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC for $ME class variable (was Re: RF... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC for $ME class variable (was Re: RF... David L. Nicol
- RE: RFC 124 (v1) Sort order for any hash Brust, Corwin
- Re: RFC 124 (v1) Sort order for any hash as an exa... David L. Nicol