Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> The effects of applying C to a single hash entry would be to:
>
> =over 4
>
> =item 1.
>
> mark the entire hash as non-autovivifying (except via future calls to
> C -- see below)
This is an interesting proposal, but it seems to be missing something, or maybe I
am. I
All-
As Nat has mentioned on -meta, it's time to start wrapping things up. In
particular, I think the following "deadlines" should apply:
1. Any and all *new* RFC's should be submitted by Wednesday at the
absolute latest (preferably sooner).
2. All existing RFC's should have their f
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Interpolation of object method calls
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Sep 2000
Last Modified: 17 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 222
Ver
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
All Perl core functions should return objects
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 8 Aug 2000
Last-Modified: 15 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 7
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
True Polymorphic Objects
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 Aug 2000
Last-Modified: 16 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 159
Version: 2
Status:
