Re: RFC 152 (v1) Replace $self in @_ with self() builtin (not $ME)

2000-08-24 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Hildo Biersma wrote: > Don't impose your religion on others. If people want 'this' instead of > 'self', that should be just fine. > > It should be pretty easy to define the appropriate $ME-reader like this: > > use ObjectStyle 'self'; > > or > > use ObjectStyle 'Java

Re: RFC: Automatic accessors for hash-based objects

2000-08-26 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, James Mastros wrote: > This example shows how much easier it would have been to write the > example on line 170 of perltoot.pod: > > package Person; > use strict; > > ## > ## the object constructor (simplis

Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods

2000-09-04 Thread Dave Rolsky
On 1 Sep 2000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > Private entries of hashes could be I accessed in packages > that inherit from the entry's package, by qualifying (i.e. prefixing) the > key with the entry's package name. For example: > > package Base; > > sub new { >

Re: RFC 222 (v1) Interpolation of method calls

2000-09-14 Thread Dave Rolsky
First of all, I think this is a great idea On 14 Sep 2000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > Are there any contexts besides double quotes ("", qq{}, <<"EOF") where this > need be applied? What about inside regexes? And if so, left and/or right > hand side? Regexes are enough like double quoted str