Re: RFC 101 (v2) Handlers and Pseudo-classes

2000-09-13 Thread John Porter
A module may remain the best implementation for this, the only problems are with speed (since the Perl 5 version requires AUTOLOAD) and also using this mechanism for core methods (like the new Copen from RFC 14). Just MHO, but I don't think this is the kind of thing that should go in the

Re: RFC 101 (v2) Handlers and Pseudo-classes

2000-09-13 Thread Nathan Wiger
[added -io cross-post] John Porter wrote: Just MHO, but I don't think this is the kind of thing that should go in the core. Just MHO. I think I agree. Just to clarify, the only reason it's an RFC and not just a Perl 5 module is because RFC 14 (the one on a new open()) relies on a handler