Re: RFC 161 (v2) OO Integration/Migration Path

2000-08-28 Thread Matt Youell
I've read over 161 again and I'm starting to see areas where I can clarify things greatly. I apologize for the confusion. I'll make mods to the RFC in the near future, after I get more feedback from you all. Here are my goals as they probably should have been stated in the RFC: - Concentrate

Re: RFC 161 (v2) OO Integration/Migration Path

2000-08-28 Thread Bart Lateur
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 06:14:00 -0700, Matt Youell wrote: So an int gets stored as two bytes and not four or eight. Gee, I thought it was more like 30. The savings in bytes don't look too impressive in this case. 4 byte addition is as fast as 2 byte addition on most pmodern platforms -- and you

RE: RFC 152 (v1) Replace $self in @_ with self() builtin (not $ME )

2000-08-28 Thread Damian Conway
What I meant to say was more along the lines of "if this could be done as a macro, does it need to be a pragma, or could it be part of a standard macro package?" And, secondly, "if this *is* part of a standard macro package, wouldn't it be cool to let it shove arbitrary