Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16 Sep 2000 03:12:06 -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>
> >The only major change to the text of this RFC was to remove a paragraph
> >stating that this RFC is particularly targeted to keep C
> >off by default.
>
> Yet, I personally would prefer it i
At 09:39 AM 9/16/00 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> > Yet, I personally would prefer it if strict 'refs' is always on by
> > default. Would this hinder one-liners? How many one-lliners do you write
> > that depend on symbolic references? None, I hope.
>
>The problem with this is that now we're only t
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 09:39:28 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
>But not:
>
> no strict 'refs';# on by default, disable
> use strict 'vars';
>
>Which is too confusing.
I wonder if 'strict' shouldn't be turned into 2 or 3 separate pragma's,
instead of just one. IMO, there isn't a strong between str
> Yet, I personally would prefer it if strict 'refs' is always on by
> default. Would this hinder one-liners? How many one-lliners do you write
> that depend on symbolic references? None, I hope.
The problem with this is that now we're only turning some strictness on,
like turning some warnings o
On 16 Sep 2000 03:12:06 -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>The only major change to the text of this RFC was to remove a paragraph
>stating that this RFC is particularly targeted to keep C
>off by default.
Yet, I personally would prefer it if strict 'refs' is always on by
default. Would this hin
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Daniel Chetlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 3 Aug 2000
Last Modified: 15 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROT
