Re: RFC 174 (v1) Parse Cfunc($obj, @args) as Cfunc $obj (@args)

2000-08-30 Thread Damian Conway
This whole thing is actually a deep and complicated imbroglio--as I know you, Damian, are aware. I don't know your ideas for untangling it. Sure you do: indirect objects MUST DIE! ;-) But I freely admit that's not a satisfactory solution. Meanwhile, thank-you for the masterly

Re: RFC 174 (v1) Parse Cfunc($obj, @args) as Cfunc $obj (@args)

2000-08-30 Thread Nathan Wiger
Tom Christiansen wrote: But I will *not* relish typing STDERR-print("darn") Agreed. The day this is required is the day Perl stops becoming fun and starts becoming C++. No matter what, I think that any basic script should be able to be written without any -'s. One goal of my RFC was

Re: RFC 174 (v1) Parse Cfunc($obj, @args) as Cfunc $obj (@args)

2000-08-30 Thread Nathan Wiger
Damian Conway wrote: Nor I. That's why I'd advocate mandatory braces on indirect objects. I'd rather: print {STDERR} "darn" any day. Sorry, I'm way against that. If you're going to force that, then just enforce: STDERR-print("darn") Same amount of typing. Indirect objects