Phil, please see the perlfunc entry for pos and the perlre section
on \G. This is what you need.
Thanks a lot! I know about pos but thought it was read-only.
And \G is relatively new, isn't it? Certainly wasn't
existing in '97 when I learned perl :-)
And the basics are seldom read again in
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:17:22AM +0100, Stéphane Payrard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:42:27PM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
Stéphane Payrard:
# I was so sure that, in case of success, the file operators
# would return the filename that I wrote the following code to
# print where are
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:42:27PM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
Stéphane Payrard:
# I was so sure that, in case of success, the file operators
# would return the filename that I wrote the following code to
# print where are the perl interpretors in the PATH. But, in
# case of success, fileops
On 2003-02-11 at 16:52:36, Dave Whipp wrote:
Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On 2003-02-11 at 17:44:08, Mark J. Reed wrote:
pop @{[@a,@b,@c]}
It creates an anonymous array, then removes the last element,
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On 2003-02-11 at 17:12:52, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
(@a,@b,@c).pop
This doesn't make any sense, since pop modifies the pop-ee.
What do you expect should happen here?
[@a,@b,@c].pop
Same as above.
Except that the Perl5 equivalent, ugly as the
On 2003-02-12 at 11:07:45, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
Meaning that I think this should be possible, but I'm not
sure if that syntax is correct, because it would mean that
the arrayrefs would need to be their own class to allow
a method to be called on it.
No, they wouldn't, unless I'm missing
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Deborah Ariel Pickett
wrote:
But is it OK for a list to be silently promoted to an array when used
as an array? So that all of the following would work, and not just
50%
of them?
(1..10).map {...}
[1..10].map {...}
And somehow related to
--
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:28:23
Luke Palmer wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:34:57 -0800
From: Michael Lazzaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
Indeed, this supports the distinction, which I will reiterate:
- Arrays are
As near as I can tell, the only problem with the nice flow of:
A Iliteral is a piece of data.
A Iscalar is a variable that holds a literal.
A Ilist is a sequence of literals and scalars.
An Iarray is a variable that holds a list.
is the Rvalue-assign list, which takes the form of:
($r1, $r2,
--
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:29:29
Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
As near as I can tell, the only problem with the nice flow of:
A Iliteral is a piece of data.
A Iscalar is a variable that holds a literal.
A Ilist is a sequence of literals and scalars.
An Iarray is a variable that holds a list.
--
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 17:14:17
Erik Steven Harrison wrote:
--
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:29:29
Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
As near as I can tell, the only problem with the nice flow of:
A Iliteral is a piece of data.
A Iscalar is a variable that holds a literal.
A Ilist is a sequence of
Here are some of the answers from my own notes. These behaviors have
all been confirmed on-list by the design team:
An @array in list context returns a list of its elements
An @array in scalar context returns a reference to itself (NOTE1)
An @array in numeric (scalar) context returns
12 matches
Mail list logo
