On 8/24/05, Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry wrote:
Plus I still think it's a really bad idea to allow intermixing of
positionals and named. We could allow named at the beginning or end
but still keep a constraint that all positionals must occur together
in one zone.
If
Here's a suggestion:
Outside of argument lists, both a='b' and :a('b') (and friends) are
equivalent, and denote an ordinary pair value.
Within argument lists, both of them are special syntactic forms for
named arguments:
foo(a = 'b', :cd); # both named args
If you want to pass pair values
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 20:23:55 +1000, Stuart Cook wrote:
Here's a suggestion:
snip
Within argument lists, both of them are special syntactic forms for
named arguments:
foo(a = 'b', :cd); # both named args
snip
my $pair = :ab;
foo($pair); # not a named-arg call
snip
...or else
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:13:03 +0300, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
perl6 creates a new instance of the perl compiler (presumably an
object). The compiler will only compile the actual file 'foo.pl',
and disregard any 'require', 'use', or 'eval' statements.
use has the potentional
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:16:56 -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:13:03 +0300, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
perl6 creates a new instance of the perl compiler (presumably an
object). The compiler will only compile the actual file
On Aug 25, 2005, at 7:16 AM, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:13:03 +0300, Yuval Kogman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
perl6 creates a new instance of the perl compiler (presumably an
object). The compiler will only compile the actual file 'foo.pl',
and
Hi,
Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:16:56 -, David Formosa (aka ? the
Platypus) wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:13:03 +0300, Yuval Kogman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perl6 creates a new instance of the perl compiler (presumably an
object). The compiler will only compile the
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 15:42:28 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
This section will contain all information needed:
* User-defined operators
* Other symbols exported by is export
* Exported macros
Okay, this raises a distinction:
Compile time exports
Runtime exports
Modules
Hi,
Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 15:42:28 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
This section will contain all information needed:
* User-defined operators
* Other symbols exported by is export
* Exported macros
Okay, this raises a distinction:
Compile time exports
Runtime
Hi,
with PIL-Run (Perl 6 to Perl 5 compiler) progressing rapidly, the topic
binding came up on #perl6.
Binding is a simple symbol table manipulation, right?
No, consider @array[$idx] := $var or more generally
$sub(@args) := $var.
Then we wondered what should happen to array elements which
On 8/25/05, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:16:56 -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:13:03 +0300, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
perl6 creates a new instance of the perl compiler (presumably an
All~
I have a simple question. Who comprises @Larry? I am fairly sure
that I know a few people in it, but I am highly doubtful that I know
all of them.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory.
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
MF == Matt Fowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MF All~
MF I have a simple question. Who comprises @Larry? I am fairly sure
MF that I know a few people in it, but I am highly doubtful that I know
MF all of them.
if $you_have_to_ask ~~ @Larry {
say 'you are not in @Larry' ;
}
i
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:25:30PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
I have a simple question. Who comprises @Larry? I am fairly sure
that I know a few people in it, but I am highly doubtful that I know
all of them.
dev.perl.org has a Who's Who list:
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/people.html
The
14 matches
Mail list logo
