Here's a good Perl 6 final exam question:
Spot the mistake (hint: it's not in the math):
module Complex;
sub i() is export {
Complex.new(0,1)
}
multi sub infix:<+> (Complex $left, Complex $right) is export {
Complex.new($left.real + $right.real, $left.imag + $rig
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:55:21 +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Here's a good Perl 6 final exam question:
>
> Spot the mistake (hint: it's not in the math):
>
> module Complex;
>
> sub i() is export {
> Complex.new(0,1)
> }
> multi sub infix:<+> (Complex $left, Complex $rig
On 9/4/05, Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always saw scoping of multis as something that applies to the
> variants...
>
> multi sub foo {
>
> }
>
> {
> my multi sub foo {
>
> }
>
>
Folks,
I recently needed to write a series of codes on lambda calculus in
perl. As MJD has shown Perl 5 can handle lambda calculus but I am
beginning to get tired of whole bunch of 'my $x = shift' needed.
our $ZERO =
sub { my $f = shift;
sub { my $x = shift; $x }};
our
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:35:36PM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
> And I found that these can be made much, much simpler and more
> intuitive with Perl 6, even more so than scheme!
>
> our $ZERO = sub($f){ sub($x){ $x }};
> our $SUCC = sub($n){ sub($f){ sub($x){ $f.($n.($f)($x)) }}};
> our $ADD
