Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
In the following,
/ (a) [ (b) (c) | $5 := (d) $0 := (e) ] (f) /
does the first alias have any effect on where the f's will go
(probably not)?
I'll defer to @Larry on this one, but my initial impression is
that the (f) capture would go into $6.
I think that
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 02:33:12PM +0100, H. Stelling wrote:
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
In the following,
/ (a) [ (b) (c) | $5 := (d) $0 := (e) ] (f) /
does the first alias have any effect on where the f's will go
(probably not)?
I'll defer to @Larry on this one, but my initial
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:32:18AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: The synopsis says:
:
: * If a subrule appears two (or more) times in the same lexical scope
:(i.e. twice within the same subpattern and alternation), or if the
:subrule is quantified anywhere within the entire rule,
Hello,
When building code strings in Perl 5 I usually write the code,
then wrap it in double quotes, then \ escape everything light blue
under syntax highlighting. I was wondering if there'll a better
way in Perl 6.
I thought it would be nice to define the variables you wish to
interpolate
Hi again,
LS06/Macros
Is it possible to refer to a variable in a CODE quotation without
splicing it in as an AST or string? I can't see how this is
be possible under S06, unless using OUTER:: is intended to be
a non-splicing variable mention.
The sample snippet in S06 seems simple but got
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:57:18AM +0200, Brad Bowman wrote:
: Hi again,
:
: LS06/Macros
:
: Is it possible to refer to a variable in a CODE quotation without
: splicing it in as an AST or string? I can't see how this is
: be possible under S06, unless using OUTER:: is intended to be
: a
Brad Bowman asked:
When building code strings in Perl 5 I usually write the code,
then wrap it in double quotes, then \ escape everything light blue
under syntax highlighting. I was wondering if there'll a better
way in Perl 6.
I thought it would be nice to define the variables you wish to
