Luke Palmer wrote:
> I don't follow your examples. What is the logic behind them?
>
> On 9/3/06, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Examples:
>>Arguments (<1 2>) to signatures 1. (@a?) and 2. (@a) calls 2
>
> For example, I would expect this one to be ambiguous, because the 1.
> (@a
Author: audreyt
Date: Sun Sep 3 10:04:00 2006
New Revision: 11725
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
* S03: Clarify that this:
my Dog ($x, $y)
really means the same as:
my (Dog $x, Dog $y)
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
> sub traverse ( BinTree $top ( $left, $right ) ) { ... }
L has two infelicities I wanted to
fix with a patch. The first is that this style of unpacking is "really"
syntactically a Signature, but most the examples in this section
abbreviate out the optional colon. (The above is more formally spe
On Sunday 03 September 2006 14:25, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> Luke Palmer wrote:
> > On 9/3/06, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Note that the variant /with/ the parameter can be considered an exact
> >> match, but but the variant /without/ it cannot be considered an exact
> >> match.
Excu
