Em Sex, 2009-01-02 às 08:34 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
token routine_def:coro {...}
Actually, I was just looking at STD, and the correct token would be
token routine_declarator:coro { sym routine_def }
I was also looking at the spec files, and I realized that DRAFT S17
mentions
Em Qui, 2009-01-01 às 12:34 -0800, Geoffrey Broadwell escreveu:
In the below Perl 5 code, I refactored to pull the two halves of the PID
file handling out of init_server(), but to do so, I had to return a sub
from pid_file_handler() that acted as a continuation. The syntax is a
bit ugly,
When going OO, I'd say an augment()/inner() approach would be
cleanest. See
http://search.cpan.org/~drolsky/Moose/lib/Moose/Cookbook/Basics/Recipe6.pod
for an example. I don't know how to express that in Perl 6 though.
Regards,
Leon
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Steve Lukas
Author: particle
Date: 2009-01-02 14:36:54 +0100 (Fri, 02 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24732
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[spec] get rid of ugly and confusing C+option syntax (bad unix memes)--
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 03:30, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
--name :name
--name=value:namevalue
--name=spacy value:name«'spacy value'»
--name='spacy value':name«'spacy
Author: particle
Date: 2009-01-02 16:42:53 +0100 (Fri, 02 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24735
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[S19] explain how script passed on command-line or via STDIN works
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 14:19 +0200, Leon Timmermans wrote:
When going OO, I'd say an augment()/inner() approach would be
cleanest. See
http://search.cpan.org/~drolsky/Moose/lib/Moose/Cookbook/Basics/Recipe6.pod
for an example. I don't know how to express that in Perl 6 though.
There's no
Author: particle
Date: 2009-01-02 17:08:51 +0100 (Fri, 02 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24737
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[spec] add signature for perl6, and make --output-format entirely
implementation-specific
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Author: particle
Date: 2009-01-02 17:17:06 +0100 (Fri, 02 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24738
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[spec] add note about dangers of mixing -e and -e6
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Author: particle
Date: 2009-01-02 19:31:51 +0100 (Fri, 02 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24739
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[spec] C-e6 isn't a separate item, it's a idiom meaning -e '6;'; format perl6
signature, (geoff broadwell)++
Modified:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 17:08 +0100, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
+=head2 Synopsis
+
+ multi sub perl6(
+Bool :a($autosplit),
+Bool :c($check-syntax),
+Bool :$doc,
+:e($execute),
+
Thank you for the quick turnaround!
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 10:55 -0800, jerry gay wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.org wrote:
It's also not
obvious what a boolean named $doc does -- which probably means either
that it's not supposed to be a boolean, or
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:24, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.org wrote:
Thank you for the quick turnaround!
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 10:55 -0800, jerry gay wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.org wrote:
It's also not
obvious what a boolean named $doc
* Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.org [2009-01-01 21:40]:
In the below Perl 5 code, I refactored to pull the two halves of the PID
file handling out of init_server(), but to do so, I had to return a sub
from pid_file_handler() that acted as a continuation. The syntax is a
bit ugly, though.
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 22:56 +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
When I asked this question on #perl6, pmurias suggested using
gather/take syntax, but that didn't feel right to me either --
it's contrived in a similar way to using a one-off closure.
Contrived how?
Meaning, the gather/take
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:27 -0800, jerry gay wrote:
oh, yes, whoops! i responded to someone else in #pugs earlier, and
forgot to address the item here. Cperl6 --doc replaces p5's
Cperldoc (that's the latest idea from damian, although it seems not
to be published yet).
Ah, I get it! What
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.org wrote:
It does bring up a question, though. What if pid_file_handler() needed
to be broken into three or more pieces, thus containing multiple yield
statements? Does only the first one return a continuation object, which
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:27 -0800, jerry gay wrote:
oh, yes, whoops! i responded to someone else in #pugs earlier, and
forgot to address the item here. Cperl6 --doc replaces p5's
Cperldoc (that's the latest idea
18 matches
Mail list logo
