Jon Lang wrote:
Pattern to split on (used with -a). Substitutes an expression for the default
split function, which is C<{split ' '}>. Accepts unicode strings (as long as
Should the default pattern be ' ', or should it be something more like /\s+/?
// ?
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:47:01AM -0800, Dave Whipp wrote:
> Jon Lang wrote:
>>> Pattern to split on (used with -a). Substitutes an expression for the
>>> default
>>> split function, which is C<{split ' '}>. Accepts unicode strings (as long
>>> as
>>
>> Should the default pattern be ' ', or
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:47:01AM -0800, Dave Whipp wrote:
>> Jon Lang wrote:
Pattern to split on (used with -a). Substitutes an expression for the
default
split function, which is C<{split ' '}>. Accepts unicode strings (as
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:43:35AM -0800, Jon Lang wrote:
: On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:47:01AM -0800, Dave Whipp wrote:
: >> Jon Lang wrote:
: Pattern to split on (used with -a). Substitutes an expression for the
default
: split f
On 2009 Feb 4, at 11:45, Aaron Crane wrote:
FWIW, I prefer the traditional spelling, "writable". Google suggests
that "writeable" is more common on the web, though; 4.8 versus 3.7
Mghits.
I have to admit that "writable" suggests to me that you can serve a
writ on it; an unlikely case for eve
On 2009 Feb 4, at 12:56, Leon Timmermans wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:37 PM,
wrote:
+=item method IO dup()
Do we really want that? POSIX' dup does something different from what
many will expect. In particular, the new file descriptors share the
offset, which can result in some really con
