r27794 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-07-29 Thread pugs-commits
Author: jnthn Date: 2009-07-29 15:09:30 +0200 (Wed, 29 Jul 2009) New Revision: 27794 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod Log: [spec] Remove the word 'class' from a sentence where it adds confusion to the meaning. Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod

Re: Parameter binding

2009-07-29 Thread TSa
HaloO, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: ...except that captures don't capture values -- they form references. I know. The semantics I have in mind is available as \($x is copy) which unfortunately is not the default. I'm actually unsure if this is valid syntax because that implies a mixture of

Re: Parameter binding

2009-07-29 Thread TSa
HaloO, Larry Wall wrote: Yes, I think think you're probably right that the correctest answer to this will be to make the operation of binding $x++ trigger the autoincrement lazily. I consider this answer far from correct. Postincrement is an operator like any other code object and it returns

r27801 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-07-29 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2009-07-29 19:59:03 +0200 (Wed, 29 Jul 2009) New Revision: 27801 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod Log: [S06] only add @_ and %_ to default sig if actually used in body Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod