Author: masak
Date: 2010-03-03 15:16:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 29930
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] typo, discovered by particle++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
---
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-03-03 18:34:04 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 29931
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] remove 1/2 and +2-3i literal forms, now rely on angle dwimmery for
literals,
or constant folding otherwise.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] remove 1/2 and +2-3i literal forms, now rely on angle dwimmery for
literals,
or constant folding otherwise.
snip
I find this an interesting change, and I can see how it would simplify some
things, even
Mark J. Reed wrote:
Doesn't unspace work for this?
It would seem that S02 says otherwise:
Although we say that the unspace hides the whitespace from the parser, it
does not hide whitespace from the lexer. As a result, unspace is not allowed
within a token.
So, assuming that an
Surely this is not a common-enough requirement to warrant a special
syntax.
At 80-columns, you can represent integers up to ninety-nine
quinvigintillion, nine hundred ninety-nine quattuorvigintillion, nine
hundred ninety-nine trevigintillion, nine hundred ninety-nine
duovigintillion, nine hundred
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
Doesn't unspace work for this?
It would seem that S02 says otherwise:
Although we say that the unspace hides the whitespace from the parser, it
does not hide whitespace from the lexer. As a
Damian Conway wrote:
Surely this is not a common-enough requirement to warrant a special
syntax.
At 80-columns, you can represent integers up to
snip
Surely that's enough for the vast majority of users, isn't it?
Well, 80 columns was an example, albeit the most common, but the principle
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:39:58PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
: Damian Conway wrote:
: Surely this is not a common-enough requirement to warrant a special
: syntax.
:
: At 80-columns, you can represent integers up to
: snip
: Surely that's enough for the vast majority of users, isn't it?
:
:
