Re: Perl6 Test Suite

2010-03-25 Thread Moritz Lenz
Hi, drakej wrote: I am looking to work on the test suite as part of the GSoC program. I have a couple of questions, though, if somebody could help me out: The ideas page (http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?gsoc_2010_projects) spoke of the IO section needing quite a bit more

Perl6 Test Suite

2010-03-25 Thread drakej
Hello, I am looking to work on the test suite as part of the GSoC program. I have a couple of questions, though, if somebody could help me out: The ideas page (http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?gsoc_2010_projects) spoke of the IO section needing quite a bit more work, is this

Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Carl Mäsak
Carl (), Moritz (), Carl (), Moritz (): masak um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the attribute? jonalv yup masak that's what 'private' means in Perl 6. That's wrong. Perl 6's private is like Java's private - subclasses can't see it. It's just Rakudo being leaky at the

Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Darren Duncan
Carl Mäsak wrote: Carl (), Moritz (), Carl (), Moritz (): masak um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the attribute? jonalv yup masak that's what 'private' means in Perl 6. That's wrong. Perl 6's private is like Java's private - subclasses can't see it. It's just Rakudo being

Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Carl Mäsak
Carl (), Darren (): [...] and the 'trusts' keyword hasn't been realized in any Perl 6 implementation so far. I seem to recall that Pugs did support 'trusts' a few years ago, and that I used it.  But I could be wrong. -- Darren Duncan I stand corrected. A quick search through the Pugs

Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Darren Duncan
Carl Mäsak wrote: Carl (), Darren (): [...] and the 'trusts' keyword hasn't been realized in any Perl 6 implementation so far. I seem to recall that Pugs did support 'trusts' a few years ago, and that I used it. But I could be wrong. -- Darren Duncan I stand corrected. A quick search