On Thursday 17 August 2006 21:27, David Green wrote: > However, what I'm wondering is whether Order::Same is "but true" and > the others "but false"? (Which makes cmp in boolean context the same > as eqv, but it seems to make sense that way.)
OTOH, C programmers can as well assume 'cmp' being an equivalent of '! eqv' in boolean context; after all that's how strcmp() works... The same goes for assembly programmers. (* goes back lurking *) -- Alexey A. Kiritchun
