Re: !!/nor and ??!! vs. ??::

2005-09-08 Thread Luke Palmer
On 9/8/05, Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pugs currently implements &infix: as an ugly version of the > &infix: operator. > > Are these in the spec? No they are not. Destroy! Luke

!!/nor and ??!! vs. ??::

2005-09-08 Thread Benjamin Smith
Pugs currently implements &infix: as an ugly version of the &infix: operator. Are these in the spec? If so, how does !! interact with the second part of the new ??!! replacement for ??:: ? -- Benjamin "integral" Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>