[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: > @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ > > =item * > > -The new C<:rw> modifier causes this rule to "claim" the current > +The new C<:rw> modifier causes this regex to "claim" the current > string for modification rather than assuming copy-on-write semantics.
There are about eight uses of "rather than", not all seem strong enough to me: they leave room for "the other thing". This says it better: http://www.bartleby.com/64/C002/006.html I don't think that "instead of" should always rather be used, often "and not" or "so it doesn't" will be better. Among the eight is a "rather" with a missing "than". There is also a "rather easier", that one must be good. -- Groet, Ruud
