Re: Are proposals for new language methods considered?

2016-01-31 Thread Tom Browder
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Will Coleda wrote: > Nope. Most people just show up on #perl6 and chat, or make a pull > request or open an RT. Gotcha, thanks. -Tom

Re: Are proposals for new language methods considered?

2016-01-31 Thread Will Coleda
Nope. Most people just show up on #perl6 and chat, or make a pull request or open an RT. On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Tom Browder wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Will Coleda wrote: >> The language is intended to evolve; the specification will change as we go. >> >> If you have a pr

Re: Are proposals for new language methods considered?

2016-01-31 Thread Tom Browder
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Will Coleda wrote: > The language is intended to evolve; the specification will change as we go. > > If you have a proposal, go ahead and make it, see what traction it > gets on the list. Is there any specific format for a proposal? If not, is there a successful

Re: Are proposals for new language methods considered?

2016-01-31 Thread Will Coleda
The language is intended to evolve; the specification will change as we go. If you have a proposal, go ahead and make it, see what traction it gets on the list. On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > I would like to propose some new Str and IO::Path methods if such > would be cons