Re: Closure vs Hash Parsing

2008-08-11 Thread Ron
On 10 Aug., 00:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick R. Michaud) wrote: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 07:32:52AM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote: > > Jonathan (>): > > > That this means the { $_ => uc $_; } above would end up composing a Hash > > > object (unless the semicolon is meant to throw a spanner in the > > >

Re: Closure vs Hash Parsing

2008-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 07:32:52AM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote: > Jonathan (>): > > That this means the { $_ => uc $_; } above would end up composing a Hash > > object (unless the semicolon is meant to throw a spanner in the > > hash-composer works?) It says you can use sub to disambiguate, but > > > >

Re: Closure vs Hash Parsing

2008-08-07 Thread Carl Mäsak
Jonathan (>): > That this means the { $_ => uc $_; } above would end up composing a Hash > object (unless the semicolon is meant to throw a spanner in the > hash-composer works?) It says you can use sub to disambiguate, but > > %ret = map sub { $_ => uc $_; }, split "", $text; > > Doesn't work sinc