On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:06:32AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Aaron Sherman writes:
: On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:37 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
:
: We're thinking at the moment that `while` will probably look like this:
:
: sub statement:while (cond is lazy, block) {
: [...]
:
:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:24:14PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Yeah, is lazy should be fine for now. The feature is definitely
: there, but it might end up being called something different. is
: braceless?
I think is braceless is better, if only because it's longer.
Though I still suspect it's
Juerd writes:
Luke Palmer skribis 2005-04-26 9:37 (-0600):
sub statement:while (cond is lazy, block) {
How does that handle
for { closure }, { closure } - { ... }
and why? :)
Umm... maybe I'm totally misunderstanding you, but I think it doesn't,
since I'm implementing
Luke Palmer skribis 2005-05-01 1:17 (-0600):
Umm... maybe I'm totally misunderstanding you, but I think it doesn't,
since I'm implementing statement:while, not statement:for.
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. How would the same is lazy thing be
useful with for, given this example?
Juerd
--
Juerd writes:
Luke Palmer skribis 2005-05-01 1:17 (-0600):
Umm... maybe I'm totally misunderstanding you, but I think it doesn't,
since I'm implementing statement:while, not statement:for.
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. How would the same is lazy thing be
useful with for, given this
On 5/1/05, Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, for doesn't need is lazy, because it simply evaluates the
list it is given and iterates over it. The fact that evaluating the
list may be a no-op because of laziness is unrelated to is lazy
(another hint that it's the wrong name).
To
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:37 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
We're thinking at the moment that `while` will probably look like this:
sub statement:while (cond is lazy, block) {
[...]
Just curious, why a sub and not a macro?
That does pose a problem with:
given $foo {
until
Aaron Sherman writes:
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:37 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
We're thinking at the moment that `while` will probably look like this:
sub statement:while (cond is lazy, block) {
[...]
Just curious, why a sub and not a macro?
Didn't need a macro. statement:while
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:37:51AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
Joshua Gatcomb writes:
The solution is formal parameters. The trouble is I
can't seem to find a good example in S04 that matches
what I am trying to do.
while $ref() - @array { ... }
We're thinking at the moment that
Autrijus Tang writes:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:37:51AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
Joshua Gatcomb writes:
The solution is formal parameters. The trouble is I
can't seem to find a good example in S04 that matches
what I am trying to do.
while $ref() - @array { ... }
We're
Joshua Gatcomb writes:
The solution is formal parameters. The trouble is I
can't seem to find a good example in S04 that matches
what I am trying to do.
while $ref() - @array { ... }
We're thinking at the moment that `while` will probably look like this:
sub statement:while (cond is
11 matches
Mail list logo
