Re: How do you say another_sub(@_) in perl 6?
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:18:42 -0400, David Storrs wrote: On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote: nested_call.wrap(), maybe? It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is for wrapping only. This applies to super methods, delegate methods, and so forth. If I understand the semantics of wrap() properly, I believe you can do everything with wrap that you want. I agree it's not the optimal way though...for one thing, you have to write the code inside out. Not without breaking polymorphism, or doing creepy things like: our method = $?CLASS.can(method).wrap { ... call ... }; instead of method method { $?SELF.SUPER::method; # what's the syntax for this, btw? # Can't find it under s12 } Hey, I said you /could/ do it, not that you /should/ or that it was the best way. : Actually, I agreed it wasn't, I was just throwing it out there as a starting point. On the other hand, one thing i'd like to borrow is the ability to use 'call' for delegating subroutines: sub foo will call(other) { call; # just like saying other() } Seconded. Although it starts to get interesting when you want to pass in multiple other()s. --Dks
Re: How do you say another_sub(@_) in perl 6?
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:18:42 -0400, David Storrs wrote: On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote: nested_call.wrap(), maybe? It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is for wrapping only. This applies to super methods, delegate methods, and so forth. If I understand the semantics of wrap() properly, I believe you can do everything with wrap that you want. I agree it's not the optimal way though...for one thing, you have to write the code inside out. Not without breaking polymorphism, or doing creepy things like: our method = $?CLASS.can(method).wrap { ... call ... }; instead of method method { $?SELF.SUPER::method; # what's the syntax for this, btw? # Can't find it under s12 } On the other hand, one thing i'd like to borrow is the ability to use 'call' for delegating subroutines: sub foo will call(other) { call; # just like saying other() } -- () Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xEBD27418 perl hacker /\ kung foo master: /me kicks %s on the nose: neeyah! pgpgk8s0nYZ8S.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How do you say another_sub(@_) in perl 6?
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote: nested_call.wrap(), maybe? It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is for wrapping only. This applies to super methods, delegate methods, and so forth. -- () Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xEBD27418 perl hacker /\ kung foo master: /me climbs a brick wall with his fingers: neeyah! pgpDOgTN4egzn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How do you say another_sub(@_) in perl 6?
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote: oops... Can I forward our correspondence to the mailing list? Sure. I was wondering why you took it private. : --Dks