Re: Implementation of :w in regexes and other regex questions

2006-02-14 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:35:18AM -0800, David Romano wrote: > On 2/14/06, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't want to just skip tags wholly, because they do > > > serve a purpose, but only in a particular context. (Can >

Re: Implementation of :w in regexes and other regex questions

2006-02-14 Thread David Romano
On 2/14/06, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't want to just skip tags wholly, because they do serve a purpose, > > but only in a particular context. (Can be changed back to a "default" > > if > > changed to include html tags?)

Re: Implementation of :w in regexes and other regex questions

2006-02-14 Thread Luke Palmer
On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ==Question 1== > macro rxmodinternal: { ... } # define your own /:x() stuff/ > macro rxmodexternal: { ... } # define your own m:x()/stuff/ > With this, I can make my own adverbs then? Like :without, or :skip, and > describe what each does? Yes,