On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:35:08AM -0700, Steve Lukas wrote:
I would argue for: If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is an
error!
Well, this error happens most likely due to my tiredness and I want the
compiler to wake me up.
This can be important because I would
Steve Lukas skribis 2006-09-11 4:35 (-0700):
If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is the same lexical
I would argue for: If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope,
it is an error!
I agree.
The reason that I love my $foo is that it always gives me a new
variable. I can
Steve ():
If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is the same lexical
I would argue for: If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is an
error!
I agree.
Enforcing one and only one declaration feels like a Good Thing, for
Juerd's reasons. With me, multiple 'my' for
