On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:33:15AM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: pugs, rakudo and elf all agree that [1..4].elems should be 4 - and I
: agree too.
:
: What about
: sub f(@a) { @a.elems }; say f([1, 2, 3, 4])
: Again all three implementations say that it's 4, and I'm confused.
:
: Now for
: say elems [1, 2, 3, 4]
: pugs says 4, rakudo says 1, and elf says "Undefined subroutine
: &GLOBAL::elems called".
: Now, which one is right?
:
: What about
: say elems([1, 2, 3, 4],)
: pugs says 4, rakudo says 1, and elf says... you get the picture.
Pugs is correct. The first arg binds to @a in every case.
Larry
