Re: Should @x be defined after only "my @x"? (RT #64968)

2009-08-13 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:25:49PM -0500, Kyle Hasselbacher wrote: > use v6; > > my $s;   #  ! $x.defined > my @a;  # @a.defined > > That's the current Rakudo behavior. RT #64968 suggests that this is a > bug. In Perl 5, @a would not be defined until something was put into > it. Which should i

Re: Should @x be defined after only "my @x"? (RT #64968)

2009-08-12 Thread Uri Guttman
> "KH" == Kyle Hasselbacher writes: KH> use v6; KH> my $s;   #  ! $x.defined KH> my @a;  # @a.defined KH> That's the current Rakudo behavior. RT #64968 suggests that this is a KH> bug. In Perl 5, @a would not be defined until something was put into KH> it. Which should it be?