On 8/11/05, TSa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HaloO,
>
> Autrijus Tang wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 08:02:00PM +1000, Stuart Cook wrote:
> >>my Foo ::x;
> >>a) ::x (<=) ::Foo (i.e. any type assigned to x must be covariant wrt. Foo)
> >>b) ::x is an object of type Foo, where Foo.does(Class
HaloO,
Autrijus Tang wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 08:02:00PM +1000, Stuart Cook wrote:
my Foo ::x;
a) ::x (<=) ::Foo (i.e. any type assigned to x must be covariant wrt. Foo)
b) ::x is an object of type Foo, where Foo.does(Class)
c) Something else?
My current reading is a) -- but only if
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 08:02:00PM +1000, Stuart Cook wrote:
> What's the current meaning of type annotations on type-variables?
>
> For example, if I say...
>
> my Foo ::x;
>
> ...which of these does it mean?
>
> a) ::x (<=) ::Foo (i.e. any type assigned to x must be covariant wrt. Foo)
>
