On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, [ISO-8859-2] BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
I'm just wondering, if the following would be possible with Perl 6 or not?
XML
$a=Content #1Content #2;
[snip]
The ideas coming from Comega, the next version of CSharp(?). Here's an intro
about it:
Some time ago I asked a somewhat related qu
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:13:42 -0400, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heredocs are variants on q:to these days, but if you're going
to be mixing Perl and SQL syntax, it's probably better to dispense
with the heredoc and just have a language variant so that you can
parse it at compile time. A h
Hi,
What is the benefit of this syntax over having a simple function that
takes one argument, interpolating variables from CALLER::?
for sql 'SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=$id' { ... }
The difference is between compile time parsing and runtime parsing. This
expression can be transformed to a pr
Matt skribis 2005-04-20 13:51 (-0400):
> If not already possible, it would be neat to be able to define your own
> quote blocks. Such as being able to define how to parse the below lines:
It is possible to create your own sql// if you want it.
> for q:sql/SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=$id/
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:51:11PM -0400, Matt wrote:
: If not already possible, it would be neat to be able to define your own
: quote blocks. Such as being able to define how to parse the below lines:
:
: $result = q:sql/SELECT * FROM table/;
:
: for q:sql/SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=$i
I sent this to BÁRTHÁZI only instead of BÁRTHÁZI and the list as well. So
here's a forward of what I sent and he replied to.
--- Forwarded message ---
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BÁRTHÁZI András" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: embedding langua
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:57:00PM +0200, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
: It ends, when a non opened ')', a ';' or a '}' is coming. Of course,
: that's not all cases, but it seems to be not so hard to find the all
: possible cases.
The question is what will be clear to the reader of the code.
: >We sh
Hi,
: I'm just wondering, if the following would be possible with Perl 6 or not?
:
: > XML
:
: $a=Content #1Content #2;
:
: say $a.elems[0].elem[1].content; # "Content #1"
:
: for ($a.elems) { say $_.content; }
:
: or XPath like syntax on a structure?
That's somewhat ambiguous with our curren
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:08:51PM +0200, BÁRTHÁZI András wrote:
: Hi,
:
: I'm just wondering, if the following would be possible with Perl 6 or not?
:
: > XML
:
: $a=Content #1Content #2;
:
: say $a.elems[0].elem[1].content; # "Content #1"
:
: for ($a.elems) { say $_.content; }
:
: or XPath
