On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
I've changed the flipflop operator/macro to ff, short for flipflop.
This has several benefits. ...
...another of which is that we can use ff and fff to mean loud
and really loud in our perl poetr^H^H^H^H^Hmusic. :-)
Pm
Patrick R. Michaud skribis 2006-01-25 13:47 (-0600):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
I've changed the flipflop operator/macro to ff, short for flipflop.
This has several benefits. ...
...another of which is that we can use ff and fff to mean loud
and really
On 1/25/06, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick R. Michaud skribis 2006-01-25 13:47 (-0600):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
I've changed the flipflop operator/macro to ff, short for flipflop.
This has several benefits. ...
...another of which is that we
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
I've changed the flipflop operator/macro to ff, short for flipflop.
Two questions:
1) Will ff (and fff) require whitespace around them?
2) Do we get a more punctuationish unicode equivalent?
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2006-01-25 14:49 (-0600):
1) Will ff (and fff) require whitespace around them?
I hope it will be exactly like x and xx. They need whitespace around
them if otherwise it'd be part of an identifier.
2) Do we get a more punctuationish unicode equivalent?
I fear
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 02:49:51PM -0600, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
I've changed the flipflop operator/macro to ff, short for flipflop.
Two questions:
1) Will ff (and fff) require whitespace around them?
2) Do we get a more
