Re: no 6;

2005-09-11 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:29:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > It's not valid perl 4: > > $ perl4 -e 'no 5; print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"' > syntax error in file /tmp/perl-em47tij at line 1, next 2 tokens "no 5" > Execution of /tmp/perl-em47tij aborted due to compilation errors. $ perl1 -e 'no 4;

Re: no 6;

2005-09-05 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:07:59PM -0500, David Nicol wrote: > Does this mean that we have to implement perl4 compatability? > > perl5 -e 'no 5; print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"' It's not valid perl 4: $ perl4 -e 'no 5; print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"' syntax error in file /tmp/perl-em47tij at line 1, next

Re: no 6;

2005-09-01 Thread David Nicol
On 9/1/05, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just commited into bleadperl a patch that implements this : > > $ ./perl -e 'no 5' > Perls since v5.0.0 too modern--this is v5.9.3, stopped at -e line 1. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1. > > That is, the e