Re: Regex - Accessing captured subrules could be problematic

On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:00:55PM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote: > GW wrote: > > I found something that could be problematic (haven't yet found out if it > > should be a special case) in Synopsis 5. More precisely it is under the > > chapter "Accessing captured subrules" in the test case > > t/regex/fr

Re: Regex - Accessing captured subrules could be problematic

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:19 PM, GW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I found something that could be problematic (haven't yet found out if it > should be a special case) in Synopsis 5. More precisely it is under the > chapter "Accessing captured subrules" in the test case > t/regex/from_perl6_r

Re: Regex - Accessing captured subrules could be problematic

Hello, GW wrote: > I found something that could be problematic (haven't yet found out if it > should be a special case) in Synopsis 5. More precisely it is under the > chapter "Accessing captured subrules" in the test case > t/regex/from_perl6_rules/capture.t lines 67–71: > > ok(eval(' "bookkeepe

Regex - Accessing captured subrules could be problematic

Hi, I found something that could be problematic (haven't yet found out if it should be a special case) in Synopsis 5. More precisely it is under the chapter "Accessing captured subrules" in the test case t/regex/from_perl6_rules/capture.t lines 67–71: ok(eval(' "bookkeeper" ~~ m/ ($/)/ '), 'Named