Re: progress report

On Apr 20, 8:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "John M. Dlugosz" and I have both replied to "whiteringmoon"'s query, so I > don't think anyone else need to. (If he's genuine, we don't want to > bombard him with multiple replies, and if not, let's not give out too much > spambait.) > > -- > > Email

Re: progress report

"John M. Dlugosz" and I have both replied to "whiteringmoon"'s query, so I don't think anyone else need to. (If he's genuine, we don't want to bombard him with multiple replies, and if not, let's not give out too much spambait.) -- Email and shopping with the feelgood factor! 55% of income t

Re: progress report

whiteringmoon-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote: I stumbled onto this group as I was looking for language statisics and I tried understanding what I am looking at. What is Perl? I don't mean to sound stupid in asking this. But could you explain what it is that I am looking at here? WR See

Re: progress report

On Apr 20, 3:05 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John M. Dlugosz) wrote: > I've identified a few more issues while refactoring the text across all > the synopses, but I'm just noting everything in my document.  Not enough > discussion going on to post them all. > > My main creative effort is in studying type

progress report

I've identified a few more issues while refactoring the text across all the synopses, but I'm just noting everything in my document. Not enough discussion going on to post them all. My main creative effort is in studying type systems, and musing over what it would be like to have Perl 6's typ