At 0:59 -0500 2001.01.09, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, unless we stick to the same licensing scheme we have today for perl,
which, like it or not, has served Perl very, very well.
As it turns out, this isn't an RFC under consideration by Larry, AFAIK.
The
Last year at the Open Source Expo in NY, I was really amused to see RMS and Eric
Raymond agree for the first time in history where Chinese
Linux companies were pirating the OS.
But how can you pirate free s/w ??? Makes no sense to the lay reader; in the end it
will be average people who
John van V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was really amused to see RMS and Eric Raymond agree for the first time
in history where Chinese Linux companies were pirating the OS.
I actually doubt RMS agreed that they were "pirating". I am sure he would
have used the word "copyright infringement".
