Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>
>
>bkuhn wrote:
> > >law,
> > >and it isn't worth putting statements like this in licenses. They are
> > >unenforceable through copyright law, and thus
>
>Ben Tilly wrote:
>
> > I borrowed it from both the BSD and the GPL. Even if it is
> > unenforcable, it is likely to
bkuhn wrote:
> >law,
> >and it isn't worth putting statements like this in licenses. They are
> >unenforceable through copyright law, and thus
Ben Tilly wrote:
> I borrowed it from both the BSD and the GPL. Even if it is
> unenforcable, it is likely to discourage people from abusing
> that.
Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>
>Ben Tilly wrote:
> > 4. The names of the contributers to this package may not be used to
> > endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific
> > prior written permission.
>
>Lawyers typically point out that this issue is not covered by copyright
>
Ben Tilly wrote:
> 4. The names of the contributers to this package may not be used to
> endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific
> prior written permission.
Lawyers typically point out that this issue is not covered by copyright law,
and it isn't worth putting stat
Ben Tilly wrote:
>
>OK, IANAL, nor do I pretend to any amazing expertise. Should
>this hold up legally, I will probably be the most astounded here.
>(I have not even reviewed for typos!) But at least it gives people
>something specific to argue over.
I would have been astounded with good reason.
