Re: feedback and the license of Perl (was Re: licensing issues)

[Chris Nandor]

At 20:04 -0500 01.16.2001, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>Related to this, though, I have a procedural question:
>
>   Does anyone know if Larry is considering "leave it as it is" for all
>   options on RFCs?  Chris noted that there wasn't a point in writing an RFC
>   that said: "perl's license stays the same", because it was implicit.  I
>   wasn't clear that it was implicit.  Have I misunderstood?

Larry can do anything at all, regardless of the RFCs.  He can choose to
leave something as it is, accept an RFC, modify an RFC, or come up with
something new on his own.  I think this is the case with _everything_
related to this phase of things.  Rule #1 still applies.  At least, this is
my understanding.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://osdn.com/