I read *all* of Camel 1, it was a slim volume and gave (correctly) the
impression that Perl is an easy to get into language that is useful for
loads of things.
You can justifiably still say those things about Perl -- but it's not the
impression you get; and the impression is a lot of what
LOL!
No bias there then Nat :-)
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Torkington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: Perl, the new generation
Stephen P. Potter writes:
It seems to me that recently (the last two years or so)
Yep, nice thought. I might actually pull my finger out and make a
contribution. Even if it's just documentation and configuration stuff.
- Original Message -
From: H.Merijn Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nathan Torkington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001
- Original Message -
From: David Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: Perl, the new generation
.
.
.
Corporate users do not think in terms of neat and novel, they think in
terms
of how much work
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Edward Peschko" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and
CPAN)
..we're waiting
for Larry..
yep
one of the purposes of perl6-meta is to keep us crazies out of the way of
the developers hope so anyway
mike
