Re: Update on the RFC Process

2000-10-03 Thread Piers Cawley
Nathan Torkington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have no objection to -internals remaining. I think their discussion will probably take off more after Larry's announcement. Personally I'm betting that the volume we've seen on -language will pale into tiny insignificance compared to the volume on

Re: Update on the RFC Process

2000-10-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:13 PM 10/3/00 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 04:06:00PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: Personally I'm betting that the volume we've seen on -language will pale into tiny insignificance compared to the volume on -internals once Larry has made his announcement. I doubt

Re: Update on the RFC Process

2000-10-03 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Tue, 03 Oct 2000, Simon Cozens wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 04:06:00PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: Personally I'm betting that the volume we've seen on -language will pale into tiny insignificance compared to the volume on -internals once Larry has made his announcement. I doubt it;