Re: code repository

2000-09-05 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Bradley" == Bradley M Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bradley> On a personal note, I would not be able to participate in Bradley> Perl6 development if doing so required that I use Bradley> perforce, because I have personal ethical beliefs that Bradley> prohibit me from usin

Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...

2000-09-28 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Simon" == Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> Hm. So this means there's no point me submitting anything Simon> now, because it's not going to have time to be discussed Simon> and frozen? G-r-reat. Not necessarily. Nat recently posted about his misinterpretation of

Re: *REALLY*, it's getting close here...

2000-09-28 Thread Stephen Zander
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephen> Not necessarily. Nat recently posted about his Stephen> misinterpretation of Larry's plans but said he still Stephen> planned to lean on people to finish by October 1

Re: Undermining the Perl Language

2000-10-01 Thread Stephen Zander
> "David" == David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> This country (apologies to non-US citizens) was not founded David> on committee action, but on rebellion. I hope the irony of a proponent of non-profit motives holding up a rebellion that was exclusively profit-motive based i

Re: Continued RFC process

2000-10-09 Thread Stephen Zander
> "David" == David Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> If the "public say" is limited to an RFC freeforall, then David> closed off to let the elite go to work, then the whole David> "public say" policy is a farce an order of magnitude worse David> than the "great perl merg

Re: Continued RFC process

2000-10-10 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dan> A better analogy is that Larry's the Bishop and Chief Dan> Architect, while the rest of us are engineers, sectional Dan> architects, artisans, craftsmen, journeymen, and apprentices, Dan> working to build up a cathedral.

Re: Continued RFC process

2000-10-11 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dan> what happens if for some reason I turn into a raving nutter Dan> and won't go? What you mean "will", Kimosabi? :) -- Stephen "Farcical aquatic ceremonies are no basis for a system of government!"

Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core members"

2000-10-14 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Adam" == Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> No worries. These BSD guys are onto something. Here's Adam> another report from daemonnews, talking about the election Adam> process in more detail. Apparently, FreeBSD was getting Adam> stagnant, and this election is

Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core members"

2000-10-15 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Jean-Louis" == Jean-Louis Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Louis> I know that any discussion I hold in anything other Jean-Louis> than French costs me extra efforts. If the discussion Jean-Louis> is an argument, held in English, with/against a native Jean-Louis> Englis

Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core members"

2000-10-16 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Adam" == Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/misc.html#AEN4823 The entry below that is even more apropos. -- Stephen "And what do we burn apart from witches?"... "More witches!"

Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core members"

2000-10-17 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Kurt" == Kurt D Starsinic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kurt> Come come, Stephen. Don't start a flamewar. We all Kurt> know that Perl's threading model lacks fairings . . . . Moi? I'm not the one who mentioned the f-word. :) -- Stephen "Good idea, O Lord!"... "'Course it's a

[OT] Re: Perl Doesn't Suck

2001-07-02 Thread Stephen Zander
> "schwern" == schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: schwern> Sun doesn't give out its JDK source code freely, they schwern> have all sorts of restrictions. If I wanted to port the schwern> JDK I can do it, but I need special permission from Sun schwern> to distribute it. This