On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:13:30PM -0500, Adam Turoff wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 05:03:12PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
There's obvious FUD out there and we don't seem to be giving the impression of
getting much done, or doing anything to counter it.
Let's be fair. We're not getting
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
Ask, could we have the PDDs placed up on dev.perl.org in the
same way as the RFCs, please?
I made a simple list of what we have so far at
http://dev.perl.org/ppd/
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen - http://ask.netcetera.dk/
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 06:57:03AM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
Likewise. More so since I didn't even receive it.
I retract that; I've been having mail problems all weekend and it's
since arrived.
Brian, you're not in my good books today, this month or this year.
Please sort it out. Now.
I
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 11:28:45AM -0500, brian d foy wrote:
okay. i quit.
Well, hm. I'd rather we actually made something positive out of this.
There's obvious FUD out there and we don't seem to be giving the impression of
getting much done, or doing anything to counter it. Part of the
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 05:03:12PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
In order to do something about this, I suggest that we should:
i) ...
ii) ...
I forgot iii)...
Ask, could we have the PDDs placed up on dev.perl.org in the same way as the
RFCs, please?
So far we have
http:[EMAIL
brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
Perhaps we're not giving the right impression. Hey, brian, aren't
you supposed to be preventing this from happening?
no, it isn't.
I find this response somewhat mysterious.
--
a
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:46:42AM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
Perhaps we're not giving the right impression. Hey, brian, aren't
you supposed to be preventing this from happening?
no, it isn't.
I find this
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
Perhaps we're not giving the right impression. Hey, brian, aren't you supposed
to be preventing this from happening?
no, it isn't.
--
brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 09 February 2001 14:06, Simon Cozens wrote:
I'm not sure "stagnant" is the best choice of word to describe that.
It used to be that feeping creaturism was the scourge - folks clamoring for
a little stability in their tools and products. Now it seems what was once
"stability" is now
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, but you see, we're not generating code. All the rest of the stuff is
irrelevant, and Real Hackers don't need to design--it's all self-evident.
Besides, you only need to design if you're building one of those Cathedral
thingies, and we all know how bad
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
[...]
minimalism) and I tried to, but there was some kind of ugly technical
snafu with Skud's listserv and I couldn't get signed on.
listserv? We use ezmlm around here. :) If you still want to join in
then look at http://dev.perl.org/ -
11 matches
Mail list logo