Re: The new api groups

2000-11-15 Thread Philip Newton
On 14 Nov 2000, Chaim Frenkel wrote: Did I miss something? I didn't see any discussion. Was this off-line? No, on perl6-announce and perl6-internals. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The new api groups

2000-11-15 Thread David Grove
I'm on announce, I believe... I didn't get anything. (Internals seems like a poor place to make than announcement.) How do I check to see that ezmlm hasn't unsubscribed me from announce when my server was down last week for a couple of days? It's read-only, so I can't test-post to it, and I'm not

Re: The new api groups

2000-11-15 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 03:34 AM 11/15/00 +, David Grove wrote: I'm on announce, I believe... I didn't get anything. (Internals seems like a poor place to make than announcement.) How do I check to see that ezmlm hasn't unsubscribed me from announce when my server was down last week for a couple of days? It's

Re: The new api groups

2000-11-15 Thread Chaim Frenkel
"DS" == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DS At 03:34 AM 11/15/00 +, David Grove wrote: I'm on announce, I believe... I didn't get anything. (Internals seems like a poor place to make than announcement.) How do I check to see that ezmlm hasn't unsubscribed me from announce when my

Re: The new api groups

2000-11-14 Thread Chaim Frenkel
Did I miss something? I didn't see any discussion. Was this off-line? Where is this list of api groups? chaim "DG" == David Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DG Dan al., DG I'm very surprised to see planning groups for api and parsing for perl6 DG springing up, with goals of providing RFC's

Re: The new api groups

2000-11-14 Thread Adam Turoff
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:58:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: (Though I don't think we really need more than a few weeks to get a good set of working RFCs for this, though of course they'll get amended and expanded as work proceeds) I'd like to see a revised set of RFC guidelines