Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> I think you misunderstand. This isn't named parameters vs prototyped
> parameters vs args as list. The problem is the idea that functions
> should accept *multiple styles by default* which the proposed
> Module::Interface does.
No, it doesn't. Unfortunately, I used
Kirrily Robert wrote:
>
> I also think there's too much overhead in learning (and remembering)
> each library's quirks. My most common mistakes when using CPAN or core
> modules occur when the modules have inconsistent interfaces and I forget
> which ones take hashes and which take hashrefs, etc
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> At 03:39 PM 8/9/2001 -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote:
> >=head1 THINGS THAT NEED DOING
>
> Add to this "Define required metadata for perl modules". I think Larry
> wants version and author as required at the very least.
>
> FWIW, my current view of "The Module Plan" is for a
