Graham Barr wrote:
> > This would
> > appear largely transparent to the user, right up until they tried to do
> > isa() or ref() tests on the object.
>
> But that is the catch. Now if the language was to give us a way to support
> both in the same package in an efficient way, so much the better
Garrett Goebel wrote:
>
> Any word from on high whether subroutine signatures will apply to methods in
> Perl6? There's RFC128 and RFC97... but they both mostly dodge the issue of
> methods.
>
> The absense of method signatures for specifying required, optional, and
> named parameters... not to
