Re: Junctions now being stringified as one alternative per line?

2018-02-25 Thread Timo Paulssen
That was the behaviour before those commits. It was explicitly changed to how it works now, I believe. On 25/02/18 16:54, yary wrote: > Should "say" handle junctions and wrap them with ".gist?" Seems like > it ought to, but maybe that introduces problems. > > -y > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:48

Re: Junctions now being stringified as one alternative per line?

2018-02-25 Thread yary
Should "say" handle junctions and wrap them with ".gist?" Seems like it ought to, but maybe that introduces problems. -y On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Timo Paulssen wrote: > That's right. Say will also call .gist on what you pass to it, but say > doesn't declare that it

Re: Junctions now being stringified as one alternative per line?

2018-02-25 Thread Timo Paulssen
That's right. Say will also call .gist on what you pass to it, but say doesn't declare that it handles junctions, so before it can call .gist on what it gets, it will be handled by the auto-threader, so you'll get say, and therefor .gist, called on everything inside the junction and the result

Re: Junctions now being stringified as one alternative per line?

2018-02-25 Thread yary
I don't have Rakudo handy, is the answer to "how to make junctions show as Sean expects" say $junction.gist ; ? -y On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Timo Paulssen wrote: > I'm pretty sure you're running up against this change in rakudo: > >