Oh, thanks, now it makes sense.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:01 PM Brian Duggan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 14, Aureliano Guedes wrote:
> > In this point, the unique weirdness I'd like to understand is why in Raku
> > `@nums.log == 2.302585092994046e0`. I don't understand where this value
> >
On Wednesday, October 14, Aureliano Guedes wrote:
> In this point, the unique weirdness I'd like to understand is why in Raku
> `@nums.log == 2.302585092994046e0`. I don't understand where this value
> comes from.
This comes from the length of the array; the array is coerced into a numeric
I'd like to help with my 2 cents.
Given your comparison with R, sum, and mean are expected to play with a
vector rather than log and sin are expected to play with single numbers.
Then, the expected behavior for numerics types in Raku still the same as in
R. The difference is only that the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:02 AM Larry Wall wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 01:14:09PM -0300, Aureliano Guedes wrote:
> : > This seems pretty convenient and intuitive. At least, it is possible
> : > to mimic that behavior in Raku:
> : >
> : > List.^find_method('split').wrap: {
