Agreed!
-y
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 6:45 PM Ralph Mellor
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:12 PM yary wrote:
> >
> > It's not good practice to use "map" for side effects only, discarding
> > the returned value–which happens here
>
> I agree.
>
> > Would [using `for`] also work-around the lack
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:12 PM yary wrote:
>
> It's not good practice to use "map" for side effects only, discarding
> the returned value–which happens here
I agree.
> Would [using `for`] also work-around the lack of sink context in TWEAK?
Yes.
> I think it is a cause of the unexpected
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:50 PM yary wrote:
>
> how to get all nested captures worked for me ... not sure I agree with the
> design
I think the current flattening aspect is awkward in a couple ways:
* Having to specify ``. I half like Brad's suggestion.
* Having to write `.pairs` to extract
Hi all,
Thanks Bill for posting your results from my samples. Seems like we both
get lots of warnings/errors from our REPL's, me even with 2021.02.01. I
suspect there must be something going on with what the REPL is trying to
print, after all it does want to display the results of every line. I
Good to see this investigated down to the details, yet I just realized
something that was bothering me about it. Going back to the original post:
submethod TWEAK {
$!filelist.lines».split(',').map( -> ($a, $b) { @!show.push: ( $a, $b
) });
}
It's not good practice to use "map" for side
