On May 29, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Audrey Tang wrote:
Personally, I think a canonical acceptance test suite is more
important than a canonical implementation, but if the Parrot/Perl6
official-perl6 plan works out, that's wonderful too. :-)
That's so cool. :-) This positive attitude toward testi
在 2006/5/29 下午 11:43 時，Rob 寫到：
I see that there's work being done on a perl6 implementation under
languages in parrot. How is this effort related to the pugs
project? Is the aim of this to provide an alternative
implementation of perl6 to pugs? Is one of them the destined to be
the ca
On May 29, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Rob wrote:
BTW, glad to see the emergence of this mailing list, but I noticed
it not yet listed on the "Current mailinglists" page here: http://
dev.perl.org/perl6/lists/.
Thanks, I've added it now.
Generally that sort of thing is much better told to webmaster
