> On Jun 29, 2023, at 12:21, Sean McAfee wrote:
>
> I was trying to construct a sequence of functions using the sequence
> operator, and encountered some very puzzling behavior. I was able to reduce
> it down to some very simple examples.
>
> [1] > my @s = +*, -> { } ... *
> [...]
> [2]
I was trying to construct a sequence of functions using the sequence
operator, and encountered some very puzzling behavior. I was able to
reduce it down to some very simple examples.
[1] > my @s = +*, -> { } ... *
[...]
[2] > @s[0]
Too few positionals passed; expected 1 argument but got 0
in
